New complete assessment
DICK’S Sporting Goods
ACTIVE 9+ SIGNALOne assessment, ten perspectives.
The final score is weighted; it is not the average of the axes.
Risk: 10 means lower relative risk and greater resilience. Scores are methodological opinions as of the stated date.
DICK’S Sporting Goods is one of the largest sporting-goods retail groups in the United States, selling equipment, apparel, footwear and accessories through physical stores and digital channels. The group operates concepts such as DICK’S, House of Sport and Golf Galaxy, and also owns GameChanger, a technology platform dedicated to youth sports. Its acquisition of Foot Locker, completed in September 2025 for around $2.5 billion, added a significant international network of stores specialising in sneakers, footwear and sportswear, substantially increasing its scale and global exposure.
DKS was a case where insider buying was much stronger than the chart. Following the crash associated with Foot Locker’s problems, four directors bought almost US$4 million in shares, close to the area where the stock continued trading.
The core DICK’S business remained relatively healthy and valuation had fallen sharply. However, Foot Locker integration, inventory, reduced and debt created material risks. The Score Map makes the contrast clear: stronger Insider and Valuation scores, weaker Technical and Risk scores.
| Insider / role | Date | Shares / units | Price | Amount | Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark BarrenecheaDirector | — | 17,000 | US$130.72 | US$2,222,240.00 | Not supplied |
| William ColomboDirector | — | — | — | — | Not supplied |
| Robert EddyRole not supplied | — | — | — | — | Not supplied |
| Sandeep MathraniDirector | — | — | — | — | Not supplied |
Reported total: US$3,840,000.00Cluster buying
The initial cluster was approximately US$3.72 million through Mark Barrenechea, William Colombo, Robert Eddy and Sandeep Mathrani.
A further Colombo purchase brought the total to around US$3.84 million.
The sell-off followed Foot Locker problems and a revision. Four directors bought near the prevailing trading zone while the core DICK’S business remained profitable. Colombo’s subsequent purchase added further evidence.
DICK’S sells sporting goods through its retail business; the Foot Locker acquisition added a major footwear business and integration challenge.
Core DICK’S comparable sales rose 4.9%, while Foot Locker fell 3.6%. Revenue was approximately US$5.59 billion, US$3.50, operating margin 7.9%, cash US$914 million and long-term debt US$1.9 billion.
Organic growth in the core business remained positive, but the acquisition changed the thesis. Future potential depends more heavily on recovering Foot Locker and delivering synergies.
was around 14x and approximately 9–11x. Five-year was near 0.9 in some estimates.
The discount was substantial, but reflected real execution problems.
Recent purchases were strong, but earlier insider sales were also significant. The cluster therefore did not receive 10/10.
1. Foot Locker
Stabilising the acquired operation is an important condition for earnings recovery.
2. Inventory and promotions
Normalising inventories and reducing discounts can help restore margins.
3. Synergies
Delivering acquisition synergies can improve . With pessimism reflected in valuation, small improvements could materially change expectations.
1. Integration
Foot Locker could consume capital and management attention without delivering the expected recovery.
2. Inventory
Excess stock may require further promotions and compress margins.
3.
Forecasts have already been reduced. Another downgrade would weaken the expected recovery.
The price was far below the cloud and moving averages: MA50 around US$153, MA100 US$177 and MA200 US$190.
Supports were approximately US$132.40, US$129.70 and US$128.20, with important structural support near US$120.40. Crash volume was around 2.2 times normal.
The crash broke the medium-term bullish structure. US$120–121 was the structural support area to watch.
A monthly score of 7.6 reflected stabilisation potential, but considerable technical rebuilding was still needed. Monthly reading: the US$120–121 area mattered and a positive trend had to be rebuilt.
The 9+ assessment did not mean Foot Locker integration was solved. At the post-crash price, depressed valuation, a still-profitable core business and almost US$4 million of insider buying justified the qualification within the methodology.
It was nevertheless one of the 9+ cases with a weaker technical structure and risk profile. Those differences should remain clear in the Score Map.
Score history
HISTORY PRESERVED| Date | Assessment | Final score | Score Map |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30/08/2026 | Initial assessmentDated assessment in the supplied history; map components not supplied. | 9.0 | Components not supplied |
| 01/09/2026 | Editorial reviewAssessment with ten archived components. | 9.1 | |
| 22/09/2026 | Editorial reviewDated assessment in the supplied history; map components not supplied. | 8.3 | Components not supplied |
Signal timeline
Closing price on 28 Aug 2026
New complete assessment
New complete assessment
New complete assessment
New complete assessment
6 month final review
The green line tracks time only. Each review requires a new assessment; reaching a date does not change the score.
INSIDER9+ researches public insider transactions and the associated companies. It does not execute trades, manage client portfolios or guarantee returns. Scores reflect the assessment on the stated date and may change. Every investment decision belongs solely to the user and involves a risk of capital loss.
Ordinary share · NYSE · USD.
Potential conflict: the publisher may hold a position in this security. Specific disclosure pending confirmation.
