Free research. Voluntary support.
NYSE · DKS · USD

DICK’S Sporting Goods

ACTIVE 9+ SIGNAL
INSIDER9+ SCORE MAP
SIGNAL SCORE9.0/ 10(Latest: 8.3 · 22/09/2026)9+ SIGNAL

One assessment, ten perspectives.

The final score is weighted; it is not the average of the axes.

DKS — 2026-09-01 — 9.1/10Insider Signal: 9.5/10; Price / Timing: 9.5/10; Fundamentals: 8.8/10; Growth: 8.2/10; Valuation: 9.3/10; Insider History: 8.7/10; Catalysts: 8.9/10; Risk: 7.4/10; Technical — Daily: 6/10; Technical — Monthly: 7.6/1001020304050607080910Insider Signal · 9.5Price / Timing · 9.5Fundamentals · 8.8Growth · 8.2Valuation · 9.3Insider History · 8.7Catalysts · 8.9Risk · 7.4Technical — Daily · 6.0Technical — Monthly · 7.6010
01Insider Signal
9.5
02Price / Timing
9.5
03Fundamentals
8.8
04Growth
8.2
05Valuation
9.3
06Insider History
8.7
07Catalysts
8.9
08Risk
7.4
09Technical — Daily
6.0
10Technical — Monthly
7.6

Risk: 10 means lower relative risk and greater resilience. Scores are methodological opinions as of the stated date.

COMPLETE RESEARCHInitial signal window ended · tracking until M6

REPORTED FACTS

DICK’S Sporting Goods is one of the largest sporting-goods retail groups in the United States, selling equipment, apparel, footwear and accessories through physical stores and digital channels. The group operates concepts such as DICK’S, House of Sport and Golf Galaxy, and also owns GameChanger, a technology platform dedicated to youth sports. Its acquisition of Foot Locker, completed in September 2025 for around $2.5 billion, added a significant international network of stores specialising in sneakers, footwear and sportswear, substantially increasing its scale and global exposure.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

DKS was a case where insider buying was much stronger than the chart. Following the crash associated with Foot Locker’s problems, four directors bought almost US$4 million in shares, close to the area where the stock continued trading.

The core DICK’S business remained relatively healthy and valuation had fallen sharply. However, Foot Locker integration, inventory, reduced and debt created material risks. The Score Map makes the contrast clear: stronger Insider and Valuation scores, weaker Technical and Risk scores.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION
Insider / roleDateShares / unitsPriceAmountCode
Mark BarrenecheaDirector17,000US$130.72US$2,222,240.00Not supplied
William ColomboDirectorNot supplied
Robert EddyRole not suppliedNot supplied
Sandeep MathraniDirectorNot supplied

Reported total: US$3,840,000.00Cluster buying

The initial cluster was approximately US$3.72 million through Mark Barrenechea, William Colombo, Robert Eddy and Sandeep Mathrani.

A further Colombo purchase brought the total to around US$3.84 million.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

The sell-off followed Foot Locker problems and a revision. Four directors bought near the prevailing trading zone while the core DICK’S business remained profitable. Colombo’s subsequent purchase added further evidence.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

DICK’S sells sporting goods through its retail business; the Foot Locker acquisition added a major footwear business and integration challenge.

Core DICK’S comparable sales rose 4.9%, while Foot Locker fell 3.6%. Revenue was approximately US$5.59 billion, US$3.50, operating margin 7.9%, cash US$914 million and long-term debt US$1.9 billion.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

Organic growth in the core business remained positive, but the acquisition changed the thesis. Future potential depends more heavily on recovering Foot Locker and delivering synergies.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

was around 14x and approximately 9–11x. Five-year was near 0.9 in some estimates.

The discount was substantial, but reflected real execution problems.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

Recent purchases were strong, but earlier insider sales were also significant. The cluster therefore did not receive 10/10.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

1. Foot Locker

Stabilising the acquired operation is an important condition for earnings recovery.

2. Inventory and promotions

Normalising inventories and reducing discounts can help restore margins.

3. Synergies

Delivering acquisition synergies can improve . With pessimism reflected in valuation, small improvements could materially change expectations.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

1. Integration

Foot Locker could consume capital and management attention without delivering the expected recovery.

2. Inventory

Excess stock may require further promotions and compress margins.

3.

Forecasts have already been reduced. Another downgrade would weaken the expected recovery.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

The price was far below the cloud and moving averages: MA50 around US$153, MA100 US$177 and MA200 US$190.

Supports were approximately US$132.40, US$129.70 and US$128.20, with important structural support near US$120.40. Crash volume was around 2.2 times normal.

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

The crash broke the medium-term bullish structure. US$120–121 was the structural support area to watch.

A monthly score of 7.6 reflected stabilisation potential, but considerable technical rebuilding was still needed. Monthly reading: the US$120–121 area mattered and a positive trend had to be rebuilt.

REPORTED FACTS

DKS · NYSE · USD. Ordinary share.

Official sources: Investor Relations · DKS

ANALYSIS / INTERPRETATION

The 9+ assessment did not mean Foot Locker integration was solved. At the post-crash price, depressed valuation, a still-profitable core business and almost US$4 million of insider buying justified the qualification within the methodology.

It was nevertheless one of the 9+ cases with a weaker technical structure and risk profile. Those differences should remain clear in the Score Map.

Score history

HISTORY PRESERVED
DateAssessmentFinal scoreScore Map
30/08/2026Initial assessmentDated assessment in the supplied history; map components not supplied.9.0Components not supplied
01/09/2026Editorial reviewAssessment with ten archived components.9.1
22/09/2026Editorial reviewDated assessment in the supplied history; map components not supplied.8.3Components not supplied
ELAPSED TIME · NOT PERFORMANCE

Signal timeline

25 days elapsed
DAY 030 Aug 2026
US$135.09Signal: 9.0/10NYSE · DKS · USD

Closing price on 28 Aug 2026

DAY 0M1M2M3M4M5M6
M1Review scheduled

New complete assessment

M2Review scheduled

New complete assessment

M3Review scheduled

New complete assessment

M4Review scheduled

New complete assessment

M5Review scheduled

New complete assessment

M6Review scheduled

6 month final review

The green line tracks time only. Each review requires a new assessment; reaching a date does not change the score.

INSIDER9+ researches public insider transactions and the associated companies. It does not execute trades, manage client portfolios or guarantee returns. Scores reflect the assessment on the stated date and may change. Every investment decision belongs solely to the user and involves a risk of capital loss.

Ordinary share · NYSE · USD.

Potential conflict: the publisher may hold a position in this security. Specific disclosure pending confirmation.